Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Whats That Song Dun Dun Dun Dun

The Experience of Reading England

editorial Nature Cell Biology (vol 11 | No. 7 | Jul 2009), now turns out that the reason is insufficient to science when the law is not on their side, in England, where are particularly harsh laws against slander difamacióny, scientists must go carefully when expressing an opinion that affects the interests of a mega corporation. The problem of the columnists of science in England is, increasing their risk of being sued and forced by a court to scientifically prove the veracity of their arguments, in fact, in Britain as in other parts of the world (including Mexicoprayer.

In Mexico, "Miracle products" are, not only because of the innumerable amount of health benefits that are attributed, but by the freedom and ease with which they are marketed. There seems to be voices dicidentes put some sanity to the string of arguments and not only unscientific, but simply outrageous to those who advertise. In the midst of loopholes that seem more water mantles of illegality, the miracle products are hiding in principle to the refrain of that "Drugs are not" that "responsibility for their application is quien the recommended "that are" Supplements "and exempt them from misleading outputs of any legal need scientific proof of its effects (good or bad), the first generation of these products (from fataché to Gelatin) had some difficulty with the newly released Cofepris, but recent generations of miracle products seem to have found a point of agreement and continue to pack more and more points sales across the country.

The journal Nature Cell Biology as amended, and the British Medical Journal warn of the dangers and